Salvation is what God did for us

2012-07-02 by . 9 comments

Post to Twitter

If you’ve been following along with my posts, you might have noticed that I’ve managed to cover all the standard characteristics of Evangelicalism except “conversionism, the belief that lives need to be changed”. I admit to stretching the assigned topic at times to get through the list, but this month’s topic, “Faith and Works”, is a softball pitch of the beer-in-one-hand variety for me. Salvation is the term Christians (especially Evangelicals) use to describe the conversion event and Protestantism was founded because of our insistence that conversion is an act of faith and not of works. I could dig up a quote from one of Paul’s letters and be done with it, but it turns out to be not that easy.

Motorolla MR350R A few weeks ago, my son asked me what the most important two parts of a walkie-talkie are. (He’s at a very analytic stage in life.) My answer was maybe the transmitter and the receiver, which sounded about right to him. Then we talked about which parts we could get rid of. For instance, our set has a little LED flashlight, which is handy, but not necessary. They also have a hands-free feature that makes the Push-to-Talk button potentially superfluous. If you don’t mind the cross-talk from being locked into one channel, there’s a bunch of parts that are used to set up the frequency that could be removed. The only functions of a walkie-talkie that really can’t be taken away are the ability to send and receive radio transmissions. Without one or the other, it’s just not a walkie-talkie.

Salvation is a bit like a walkie-talkie: you need both faith and works or else you don’t really have salvation.

One of Protestantism’s touchstone stories for illustrating that faith is all you need for salvation is the two criminals crucified on either side of Jesus. One mocked Jesus mercilessly, but the other asked Jesus to remember him when he came into His kingdom. It must have struck observers as pretty humorous since all three men were surely destined to suffer for a few more hours and then die. Jesus promised the man who asked that they would meet that very day in paradise. By implication, the man was saved purely by his faith in Jesus as the literal Son of God.

We have a walkie-talkie like that: it can only send pre-loaded call-tones since the microphone broke somehow. My son set up a convoluted game of hide-and-seek that involved the seeker using the receive-only device while the hider transmitted hints. (He’s at the arbitrary rule-making age too.) Lots of folks figure God works a bit like this: we are looking for Him and He transmits revelations to guide us now and again. All you need to do is know the right things and you will be saved.

Historically, this view is associated with the heresy of Gnosticism. Bonhoeffer called the modern variation “cheap grace“. Jesus’ brother, James, called it dead faith. Taken to the extreme, once a person makes the salvation decision they are assured of eternal bliss and believe nothing else matters in this life. Nothing could be further from the truth—Jesus spent the bulk of His teaching exhorting His followers to love others as themselves (the Golden Rule) and to love God with everything they had.

Aliens poster

But there is a kernel of truth in the idea that we don’t have to do something for God in order for Him to rescue us. Way back in Genesis 3, humanity was captured by evil and we cannot escape without divine intervention. The Hebrew Scriptures tell the story of a failed attempt to free one nation from the tyranny of sin via religious activity. Occasionally an individual will achieve a greater level of righteousness than their contemporaries, but when sin rubs against human institutions God’s priorities usually get lost in the shuffle. That’s why, when Jesus walked among His chosen people, He had to drive out profiteers who changed foreign money so that worshipers could pay the temple tax.

While I was on vacation in Hawaii last week, I witnessed a man pulled back to the beach by a pair of divers who had found him on the bottom of a snorkeling lagoon. Most likely, he got tired from fighting the surf, panicked, and accidentally swallowed some water. At that point, he would have been helpless to rescue himself. That’s what happens when we start getting sucked down by sin—we start off doing something a little dangerous and end up overwhelmed. I know that’s what has happened to me.

In the depths of sin, we need God to rescue us and we can never rescue ourselves. But you can’t say you’ve been rescued if you keep going back to the dangerous place and taking crazy risks. Salvation is a lot less like a ticket to heaven and a lot more like an AA chip. Thankfully and paradoxically, God has provided a way for followers of Jesus to escape sin daily: His own Spirit.

To me, salvation is the total package. We can’t save ourselves from our addiction to sin so we need faith. And yes, we risk falling back into sin if we don’t continue to pursue a godly life via works. In order to be effective at either faith or works, we need God’s Spirit to guide our steps. Further, we need the other believers to support us in these things. And prayer! Don’t forget prayer. Reading your Bible can help too. And so on.

All of this is to say, you could probably communicate with a pair of walkie-talkies that have just a transmit and receive function, but that’s not the best option. Even seemly pointless features, like a flashlight, turn out to be wonderfully useful and appreciated at times. God isn’t really interested in giving us the most basic tools to live a good life. He’s interested in giving us the best tools:

For thus says the LORD:
“Sing aloud with gladness for Jacob,
    and raise shouts for the chief of the nations;
proclaim, give praise, and say,
    ‘O LORD, save your people,
    the remnant of Israel.’—Jeremiah 31:7 (ESV)

So in the weeks to come, starting with Bruce‘s Arminian/Wesleyan perspective, remember that we all agree that Salvation is what Jesus has done for us even though we disagree about the mechanism of Salvation.

Filed under Uncategorized


Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  • Good use of vivid analogies!

    But I’m not sure I understand the meaning of this one sentence:

    Occasionally an individual will achieve a greater level of righteousness than their contemporaries, but when sin rubs against human institutions God’s priorities usually get lost in the shuffle.

    Is your point that God works differently with individuals than with groups, or are you saying something else?

    • Jon Ericson says:

      Good question and thanks for the compliment!

      In Ezekiel 14, we read that Noah, Daniel and Job were righteous men who could save themselves, but not anyone else. I think in the pre-Christian epoch, God did call out certain people to rise above the rest of the world. God’s purpose was to save everyone via the Jewish temple system, but it failed to even save most Jews. So what God did via Jesus was surprising: a righteous man who condemned the best system of human morality around (see Mark 7) and yet fulfilled all of it’s promises.

      Now, I think the Church is being formed to fulfill the promises of the temple system. We really can’t obtain individual righteousness in the same way that the patriarchs did, in my opinion. Our righteousness comes from Jesus. In fact, I think even Noah’s righteousness was possible in anticipation of Jesus.

      But I admit, I didn’t research this post as much as it deserved and I look forward to being corrected in the next few weeks. 😉

  • “Salvation is a bit like a walkie-talkie: you need both faith and works or else you don’t really have salvation.” I thought faith plus works was the catholic position.

    And though it looks cool, from the text I can’t see how that Aliens poster is relevant here. 😐

    • Jon Ericson says:

      Well, you might need to watch Aliens again. 😉 My point was that we are sort of like Newt, trapped by the Alien Queen, which represents sin. In that situation, we need a Ripley to rescue us. (Probably too subtle. Sorry about that.)

      As for holding the Catholic position—I might be coming around to it, in a way. But, the evangelical position is that works are necessary in response to salvation. I’m counting on waxeagle to really hit the “faith alone” angle. 😉

  • “evangelical position is that works are necessary in response to salvation” Oh yes. I think I’ve read on this somewhere. If I’m not mistaken, catholic position is that works are a contributing factor to salvation, while evangelical is that good works are a result of being saved. Thin line of difference, creates a big fuss nonetheless. 🙂

    “Well, you might need to watch Aliens again” Yes indeed. I’ll put it up this weekend and then come back and enjoy your analogy. 😉

  • JohnGroupse says:

    Good works certainly flow from a greatful heart, however , it is hard to imagine Jesus conditionally offering salvation with the anticipation of a behavioral payoff. Godly love has no price. The act of creation, the breath of life and the love-igniting touch to the heart by an eternal Father sets the stage. We fall. He offers an emancipation process (Jesus) isn’t the only work that is required acceptance?

    • Jon Ericson says:

      I agree with you on all of this. The trouble pops up when we fail to tremble at the severity of our fall and the goodness of God’s grace to us. That’s what Bonhoeffer means by “cheap grace”. When we care so little about the spiritual change within us that there’s no outward difference between the saved and the unsaved, we’ve cheapened Jesus’ sacrifice for us to a mere nothing.

      I recently used this quote from John Piper:

      God loves to behold His glory reflected in His works. So the eternal happiness of the triune God spilled over in the work of creation and redemption. And since this original happiness was God’s delight in His own glory, therefore the happiness that He has in all His works of creation and redemption is nothing other than a delight in His own glory. This is why God has done all things, from creation to consummation, for the preservation and display of His glory. All His works are simply the spillover of His infinite exuberance for His own excellence.

      The truly weird thing about this is that because of Jesus, we can participate in the work of glorifying God!

  • John Groupse says:

    The sun’s glory is life giving light. No light, no sun. The Father’s glory is every act He performs. Our understanding of it has no impact on His glory. Our appreciation of it keeps us in the proper relationship with Him and prospers our growth and divine intimacy. A relationship is always limited by the one willing to give the least to it. Our growth comes from the willful discipline to do what we should and not what we want. The voice of should is God’s, the voice of want is our limitation and why we need salvation. God’s glory cannot shine any brighter and will never diminish.

  • “For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God’s sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous.” Rom. 2:13 Well this fellow isn’t J. Piper, but he ain’t wrong as Piper is.

  • Comments have been closed for this post